Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

OUTLOOK: Who knew what at Saatchi and Saatchi?

Tuesday 10 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As the dust begins to settle on the latest shinanigans at Saatchi and Saatchi (though perhaps it is a bit early to talk of settling dust), some serious questions need to be asked. Most vital is who knew what and when. It is possible that most of the selling and shorting in Saatchi shares over the last month or so was merely a response to events. It is equally possible it was peculiarly well informed. Certainly the Stock Exchange has a difficult task on its hands as it begins what may prove to be a very wide ranging insider dealing probe.

Then there is the question of what Jeremy Sinclair and the other musketeers who bailed out on Monday thought they were doing airing their letters of resignation before the company could announce them to the Exchange. They must have known it to be price-sensitive information. Perhaps David Herro, the fund manager who started all this, is right after all. Admen are not fit to run a welk stall, let alone a substantial public company.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in