Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: PowerGen

Thursday 24 September 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PETER MANDELSON is reported to be in favour of transferring responsibility for merger decisions away from ministers and into the hands of an independent competition authority. Yet the latest decision from the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry suggests he is less keen on practising what he preaches.

Both the Director General of Fair Trading, John Bridgeman, and the electricity regulator, Professor Stephen Littlechild, had reservations about allowing the PowerGen-East Midlands merger through.

The OFT recommended that the deal be packed off to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. Professor Littlechild felt that, while undertakings would be sufficient to overcome the competition worries, the minimum requirement was the disposal of 6,000 megawatts of generating capacity.

Mr Mandelson has waved the deal through and allowed PowerGen to get away with selling only 4,000 megawatts - the equivalent of two power stations. This is one more than its chairman Ed Wallis had in mind but one less than Professor Littlechild deemed necessary to create a competitive market.

If Mr Mandelson is going to ignore one set of advice and split the difference in respect of another, it is worth asking what the regulators are there for.

Mr Mandelson was already on shaky ground since it is known he was lobbied by PowerGen over the East Midlands deal before he took up his new post. Nor is his position helped by the fact that the lobbying was done by GPC, the company that employed the Mandelson acolyte Derek Draper until Lobbygate forced him to earn a living elsewhere.

There may be persuasive arguments as to why it is now right to restructure the electricity industry into a series of large integrated players which generate, distribute and supply power. Certainly, they have more of a chance of making domestic competition work than if the existing regional suppliers are allowed to sign a non-aggression pact and sit back on their local franchises.

But Mr Mandelson needs not only to be whiter than white, but also to be seen as such. There are other awkward competition decisions looming for him - such as the sale of British Airways slots and the Murdoch bid for Man United. The sooner he relieves himself of responsibility for such matters, the better.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in