Outlook: Mirror Group
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SO DAVID MONTGOMERY might be in with a chance after all. The former Mirror Group chief executive has been trying to mount a venture capital backed bid for his old company ever since he was ousted earlier this year. We've yet to see the colour of his money, but Mr Montgomery must be thinking the tide is turning his way after yesterday's less than convincing bid for Mirror Group from Philip Graf's Trinity. The terms are more akin to a no premium merger than a knockout takeover bid, and although they have the irrevocable support of Mirror's largest shareholder, Phillips & Drew, they may be sufficiently poor to allow potential for a venture capital backed alternative.
Even the language is that of a "merger", with give and take on both sides and jobs for everyone. There's more cash from Trinity this time round than last, but fewer shares - presumably to take account of the fact that Trinity is being forced to make such a large disposal as a condition of the bid. The net result is that the two sets of shareholders will end up with roughly half the combined group each.
Plainly there are some advantages in size for the sake of it, while cost savings are anticipated to be pounds 15m annually. But in the end it is hard to think of this deal as anything other than just a rather uninspired piece of further newspaper consolidation. Lack-lustre or not, it is generally assumed in the City that the deal will go through - that in the end Mr Montgomery and the other potential venture capital bidder, Regional Independent Newspapers, will not be able to muster the firepower to compete. The clock is now running, and for Mr Montgomery or anyone else who fancies taking a pop, it's put up or shut up time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments