Outlook: Mirror Group
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SO MAYBE David Montgomery was right after all. The Ulsterman was forced to step down as chief executive of Mirror Group in January because he was supposedly blocking a merger between Mirror and Trinity, the regional newspaper publisher. Yesterday, the Mirror board, minus Mr Montgomery, rejected an increased offer from Trinity as inadequate. Even Phillips & Drew, the 23 per cent shareholder which was previously so in favour of a Mirror-Trinity combination, said the offer was too low.
What has changed? A cynical conclusion would be that Sir Victor Blank, Mirror's chairman, has cooled on the prospect of a deal with Trinity now that he is no longer being promised the role of chairman in the combined group. Like Mr Montgomery, he has come to believe that Trinity should be forced to pay a premium for management control.
There's more to it than that, however. Regional Independent Media, backed by deep-pocketed venture capitalists, has already offered 200p in cash for each Mirror share, and is considering upping its bid. Even after yesterday's share price jump, Trinity's cash-and-shares offer is only worth 213p per Mirror share - well short of the 220p-230p that analysts think the company is worth.
Ultimately these are all just skirmishes in what remains a phoney war. The fact is that, until the Monopolies and Mergers Commission has cleared both potential bidders, neither is in a position to launch a firm offer. Given that the MMC investigation will take at least three months, any discussion of value in the meantime is largely futile.
RIM is likely to register its interest in Mirror with the Department of Trade and Industry this week, triggering the MMC enquiry. The Mirror board needs Trinity to throw its hat in the ring as well, so that there are still two bidders around to force up the price in three months' time. At the end of all this, Mirror shareholders won't tolerate being left empty-handed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments