Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: ICI

Wednesday 14 October 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT SEEMS like only last week that Charles Miller Smith, chief executive of ICI, was waxing lyrical about how the stock market had got it all wrong about his company and its strategy of switching from bulk to speciality chemicals. Come to think of it, it was only last week.

Possibly it was because nobody back home believed him, but Mr Miller Smith chose a chemicals industry conference in New York to insist that he was on target to pay for his acquisition of Unilever's starch and flavourings interests with a corresponding programme of disposals in bulk chemicals.

What he might not have bargained for, however, was the wretched regulators. Yesterday they struck with a vengeance. W.R. Grace, the US packaging and chemicals group, announced it was scrapping plans to buy ICI's Crosfield offshoot for $455m because of opposition from the US Federal Trade Commission.

There was not a hint of this from Mr Miller Smith last week. The markets drew the obvious inference. If Mr Miller Smith can unexpectedly be blocked on one of his disposals, he can be blocked on others too. His promised programme for reducing debt and increasing interest rate cover could therefore be in some danger.

With or without the interference of regulators, the difficulty Mr Miller Smith has is that he bought from Unilever at the top of the market and it now looks as if he is going to have to do the bulk of his selling at the bottom.

Mr Miller Smith's strategy of swopping ICI's highly-cyclical bulk chemicals business for less cyclical speciality chemicals looked inspired at the time he embarked on it. The subsequent collapse in asset values makes it look not so clever now. It may be that the precipitous plunge in ICI's share price is justified by the mismatch between what Mr Miller Smith bought for and what he can now sell for. If so, then it is reasonable to regard the strategic switch as nothing short of disastrous.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in