Outlook: Exchange must tighten rules
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TWO MONTHS and a day after Imperial Chemical Industries was accused of issuing a profits warning to a chosen group of analysts, National Power is embroiled in a similar sort of row. A few days ago the electricity generator told a number of City experts that their forecasts for the company's international division were way off line and needed to come down sharply.
This inner circle also appears to have been advised to leave their overall forecasts for group profits unchanged, as the disappointment on overseas performance would be compensated for by better-than-expected UK results. Yesterday the company admitted to the briefings but vigorously denied, just like ICI, that the analysts had received price-sensitive information at the expense of the rest of the market - which would be in breach of Stock Exchange rules.
According to NatPower, it was approached with some wayward figures and simply offered some harmless "guidance". The fact that one of those brokers issued a strong "sell" note days after the chat and that the price has plunged 10 per cent since reports of the briefings first circulated, is nothing to do with us, the power group insists.
Oh really? The hollowness of these arguments is self-evident. If talking to just a few analysts in private about the state of your profits is not selectively-briefing, what is? The fact that the brokers approached the company, not vice versa, is immaterial. If NP had something to say to one broker about earnings, it should tell everybody else too.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments