OUTLOOK: Corporate rules in hands of admen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A lot of nonsense is talked about corporate governance but none more so than in relation to the Saatchi and Saatchi fiasco. As far as David Herro, the Chicago fund manager who was instrumental in ousting Maurice Saatchi, is concerned, the former c hairman broke just about every corporate governance convention in the book. For Lord King, one of Maurice's defenders, it is the rest of the board that broke the rules by giving in to Mr Herro's demands. The former British Airways chairman reckons the du ty ofdirectors was to put Mr Herro's demands to a vote of shareholders.
For Stanley Kalms, chairman of Dixons, corporate governance appears to mean something else. For him directors' primary duty is to clients. Failure to consult the customer about the changes was the board's biggest sin. It was never easy to define good corporate governance with any clarity. Cadbury tried and largely failed. In practice it clearly means different things to different people. Plainly there is still as deep a divide in understanding between those who run and those who own Britain's publicly-quoted companies as ever.
Saatchi has provided the newspapers with a field day; rarely do you get such spectacular public mud slinging. Add in larger than life characters, big egos and a few household names and all the ingredients are there for a boardroom soap of apparently spectacular proportions. The commercial reality of the situation, however, is a good deal less dramatic than the headlines indicate. If this had been a packaging company of similar size, nobody would have given two hoots about the chairman's departure, stillless about the spectacle of other senior executives following him into a new venture. It would have been remarkable had the story commanded more than a day's space on the business pages.
But this is advertising and things just don't work that way in a people business. If there is going to be blood on the carpet it has to be suitably melodramatic. In the hands of the admen, corporate governance comes to mean just about anything you want it to.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments