Outlook: Booker should play hard to get
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BOOKER, THE gently wasting away cash-and-carry business, has probably never felt so wanted. After years of criticism as the company ricocheted from one disaster to another, it suddenly finds itself the subject of a three-way tug of love.
First Somerfield sidles up and proposes a merger. Then Budgens starts whispering sweet nothings, though it is too shy formally to declare its intentions. And of course there are the inevitable financial buyers waiting in the wings.
Booker may wonder why everyone suddenly wants to come a-courting. Somerfield wants to steamroller the deal through as quickly as possible. Somerfield's David Simons wants to fold Booker's buying power into his own as quickly as possible, so as to gain the benefit and keep up the momentum he has already established with the Kwik Save takeover. Unfortunately, it is offering only a no-premium merger similar to the Kwik Save transaction.
The Budgens approach may be even less promising, though we have not yet heard the terms. With less than pounds 400m of sales, the benefits of joint buying would be less impressive. The main asset it would bring to the party would be its management team. John von Spreckelsen has certainly done a good job at Budgens, but a reverse takeover would seem a rather elaborate and costly way for Booker to secure his services.
The problem for shareholders in Booker and its would-be predators is that these approaches are likely to be all-share deals at little or no premium. So they are a gamble on management's ability to make the deal work. Booker is under intense pressure to walk down the aisle with someone, even if neither prospective groom is entirely appropriate. It has no chief executive, and its corner shop customers are going out of business like there's no tomorrow.
Even so, the Booker board should be careful not to sell itself short. Its supplier base is a valuable asset and its distribution chain is just about to start throwing off cash after years of investment. That might make an attractive proposition for a financial buyer in a position to pay a premium and in cash. In this market, that would be preferable to almost any bidder's paper. So, while it is nice to be popular, Booker should not be surrendering to the first gentleman caller who drops by.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments