Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: Big question for the Iron Chancellor

Tuesday 17 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The news on the Government's finances has been so good it is starting to seem too good to be true. Happy is the chancellor who meets his spending targets without apparent difficulty, can afford to pay for some cherished Budget giveaways like the 10p starting rate of income tax, and can still predict a big enough improvement in the borrowing requirement that the Liberal Democrats, Britain's last tax-and-spend party, can accuse him of building up a war chest for the next election.

In fact, the war chest is a red herring, diverting attention from the fact that the Labour Government inherited a truly awful position from the Tories. The national debt had doubled under John Major's premiership, and the Government is still borrowing billions of pounds at a stage of the economic cycle when it should be in surplus. The time to talk about war chests is when the surplus is actually in the bag.

For the news probably is too good to be true, despite Gordon Brown's genuine and welcome commitment to prudent fiscal management. One worry is what will happen to tax revenues as the economy slows down. The other serious question mark hangs over the spending side of the equation. While there can be little doubt that the Chancellor has an iron grip over expenditure by Whitehall, the Treasury's control over local authority spending is still far from secure. There are big pressures in both education and public sector pay, much of which falls under local authorities. There are indeed signs in the emergence of a gap between the spending recorded in the monthly PSBR figures and much higher expenditure recorded in the quarterly national accounts figures, that control of non-departmental spending has already weakened since 1 May.

There is no reason for alarmism. Within a few months Labour has proved to be better than the Conservatives at running the public purse. But even this Iron Chancellor can not eliminate the big question that lies behind all others when it comes to government spending; how do we pay for the improvements in public services so many people want when voters are so resistant to higher taxes? The Chancellor is unlikely to have the answer when he gets up to deliver his Budget speech on 17 March.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in