Outlook: Allied/Whitbread
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HAS Hugh Osmond's privately owned Punch Taverns got what it takes to bust up Allied Domecq's grandiose plan for selling its pubs and other retail interests to Whitbread? In the City it is assumed he doesn't, but Sir Christopher Hogg, Allied's chairman, would be unwise to count on it. Word is that Mr Osmond may be in a position to mount his counter bid by next week, and furthermore, that he stands a very high chance of success.
The tax issue which seemed to make the Whitbread route so much more attractive to Allied than the Punch Taverns one is now close to being settled. Allied believed that a simple cash sale to Punch would have triggered a whopping great tax liability. However, by selling to Whitbread for shares which would then be passed directly onto its own shareholders, this liability could be avoided. Ergo, Punch Taverns would need to bid pounds 300m to pounds 400m more than Whitbread to match it.
This, it now appears, is something of a red herring. Even though it is a private company, Punch could devise a similar "scheme of reconstruction" that would avoid crystallising the tax liability for Allied. This might require prior Inland Revenue approval, but there are precedents that would allow Allied shareholders to receive cash in hand, or loan notes, without it costing Allied an arm and a leg.
If this price disadvantage is removed, then Mr Osmond is obviously in with a much better chance. He only has to bid a bit more than Whitbread's pounds 2.5bn for Allied to be duty bound to recommend his offer. This is going to be embarrassing for Sir Christopher but it won't be half as bad for him as it will be for Whitbread. As it stands, Whitbread is not a terribly good company. Its share price has gone nowhere for some years and it has expensively had to buy in most of the retail brands it owns. If it fails to pull this deal off, its share price will bomb.
The effect of actually doing the deal may not be much better. To get the transaction through the competition authorities, Whitbread must demerge or sell its breweries. The more the competition authorities attempt to minimise the tie that supports those breweries, the less they are worth. In other words, the deal could end up destroying as much value as it creates. Mr Osmond is not there yet, but the smell of victory must be in his nostrils.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments