Oftel set to ease BT price curbs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The telecoms industry regulator Don Cruickshank will today announce an easing of price controls over BT but the two sides may still be on a collision course over his plans to clamp down on anti-competitive behaviour.
Mr Cruickshank is expected to propose abolishing controls on the prices charged to large business customers and relax the limits on how much domestic bills can be increased by.
But he is likely to insist that the new price control formula is "indivisible" from general powers he is seeking to curb any anti-competitive behaviour by BT as the market is deregulated.
BT will be referred automatically to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission if it refuses to agree to a new anti-competitive clause being written into its licence.
BT is presently not allowed to raise charges by more than inflation less 7.5 percentage points. In March, Mr Cruickshank proposed price rises should be capped at RPI less 5-9 per cent for the four years from July 1997. At the top end of the range that would have cut the average domestic bill by pounds 50 a year.
He is thought to have been persuaded by industry-wide representations that to set the price cap so tightly would prevent rival operators entering the market, thereby stifling competition.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments