Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oftel proposes relaxing rules for Mercury

Mary Fagan Industrial Correspondent
Friday 22 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MARY FAGAN

Industrial Correspondent

Don Cruickshank, director general of Oftel, the telecommunications watchdog, created fresh controversy in the industry yesterday by proposing significant relaxations in the rules governing Mercury, the main rival to BT.

The move came only 24 hours after a row erupted between BT and Oftel concerning plans by the regulator to acquire "sweeping" new anti-competitive powers over BT, fuelling speculation that the company will end up at the Monopolies and Mergers Commission.

Under yesterday's proposals, Oftel would remove from Mercury the need to publish details of tariff changes 28 days in advance. Other changes include an end to the prohibition of unfair cross-subsidies to Mercury's apparatus production and supply businesses and abolition of the need to keep separate accounts.

Mr Cruickshank said the changes were justified because Mercury did not have "market power" at national and local call level. He said: "This view is based not only on its market shares but also on other factors, including that it faces considerable competition from BT and new entrants." But he added that Mercury could face similar restrictions to BT in the international market, where it has a share of just under 25 per cent.

A spokesman for BT said: "It looks as though they are downgrading Mercury from the status of the second player to `just one of the others'. This is a relaxation that makes life easier for Mercury but it also appears to put Mercury into the position of second-class citizen."

One industry source said that the more lenient approach to Mercury made it all the more likely that BT would opt for a reference to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission rather than accept Oftel's proposal to acquire a more general anti-competitive power over the company. He said there was a "more than 90 per cent" likelihood that the MMC would become involved unless Mr Cruickshank backed down, adding: "It looks like being a busy 1996."

Mr Cruickshank said: "My aim is to remove unnecessary restrictions on Mercury while keeping in place appropriate controls in the international market. I believe the detailed controls in the existing licence unnecessarily restrict Mercury's commercial freedom."

Mercury welcomed the proposals, saying they would put it on an equal footing with other operators and "give us the freedom to compete more effectively and the flexibility to meet our customers' individual needs".

The proposals are the latest in a series of moves by Oftel that have increasingly angered BT and resulted in a sharp deterioration in the relationship between the company and the watchdog. The culmination was Oftel's statement on Thursday outlining plans for general anti-competitive powers over BT, which Mr Cruickshank said were vital for further development of competition and liberalisation. BT must accept those proposals or be referred to the MMC, with the terms of reference a matter for Mr Cruickshank.

Mr Cruickshank argues that the existing system, which involves almost 80 different anti-competitive items in BT's licences, is cumbersome and makes investigation of the company - and any subsequent action - drawn- out and overly complicated. "I think this [change] is absolutely essential to moving forward," he said.

Mercury yesterday announced the appointment as chairman of Rod Olsen, the New Zealander recently made acting chief executive of Mercury's parent, Cable & Wireless. The dramatic rise of Mr Olsen - previously C&W's finance director - follows last month's sudden departure of Lord Young of Graffham, then C&W.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in