Oasis court battle is on again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GRAHAM and Edwina Brown, the founders of the women's fashion chain, Oasis Stores, have won the right to appeal against a High Court decision in a long-running legal battle they have with the company.
In 1996, they issued writs for damages against the directors of Oasis, including brothers Maurice and Michael Bennett, the company itself, and Apax Partners, venture capitalists. The Browns alleged the company and directors committed fraud, breaches of financial responsibility and conspiracy.
But in February, Judge Rattee struck out the Browns' claim against the company, and one of the directors, on the grounds it was inadmissible. He refused leave to appeal. If that original decision stands, the Browns will lose their claim that the entire assets of the pounds 80m company should be returned to them.
But now Lord Justice Robert Walker in the Court of Appeal has decided to grant the Browns leave to appeal. He stated: "The judge's decision to strike out the claim against Oasis Stores plc raises serious issues as to the limits of proprietary restitution remedies, which merit the attention of the Court of Appeal."
Judge Rattee ruled that the claim against one of the directors, David Sarson, was without merit. However, Lord Justice Robert Walker said the Browns were allowed to appeal against the ruling concerning Mr Sarson.
Mr Barry Abrahamson, the solicitor for the Browns, said: "We are confident that we have a very strong case."
A spokesman for Oasis said that the directors of the company had no comment to make about the latest development. However, in the past the group has always denied that the Browns' legal claims had any merit.
The Browns' claim follows the arrival of the Bennetts, experienced retailers, to help the group's expansion. But instead the company ran up losses, and in 1991 it was forced into liquidation. After the business went bust a consortium, which included the Bennetts, bought it out of receivership for pounds 1.6m. Three years later the group was floated at a value of pounds 77m.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments