North Sea companies plan cost cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NORTH SEA oil and gas operators are joining forces to slash costs, writes Frances Shennan.
Representatives of the 20 biggest North Sea companies met secretly last month and agreed to co-operate and swap information. They will meet again this month to discuss both their cost-cutting priorities and how to pass this information on to the 4,000-plus companies that rely on North Sea oil and gas work.
Dr Rex Gaisford, projects director of Amerada Hess, surprised delegates at last week's International Offshore Contracting and Subsea Engineering conference in Aberdeen with his revelation about the plans, to be called CRINE - Cost Reduction Initiative for the New Era.
He said: 'If we continue with the same high-cost basis, more and more of the fields being discovered are going to be sub- economic; they will not be capable of being developed.'
Fewer personnel, he said, would help to contain costs as well as being welcome from a safety standpoint. Simpler platforms would mean fewer specialists, which would keep numbers down, while equipment could be made off-the- shelf instead of being designed from scratch for each field. Facilities could also be shared between companies. That way, said Dr Gaisford, costs could be cut by 25 per cent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments