No need to panic, the City strategists say
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There was little evidence of the panic 10 years ago in the City yesterday, where equity strategists were united in the belief that history was not about to repeat itself. "Are we in for a 1987 crash? My answer is unequivocally no," said Bob Semple of NatWest Markets. "This is not 1987," added Michael Hughes of BZW.
Chris Carter of UBS agreed, saying that the bank's global valuation model suggested a world-wide overvaluation of 10 per cent. "The same model generates a 35 per cent over-valuation for 1987," he said.
The strategists pointed to important differences. In 1987, according to UBS, inflation was rising and bond yields heading upwards, signs that markets should fall, whereas in 1997 the reverse is the case.
Another important factor is the supply of equities, which was far higher in 1987 than now. "In 1987, 65 per cent of turnovers were financed by paper, as opposed to around 15 per cent now", said Philip Wolstencroft of Merrill Lynch. Mr Hughes of BZW attributes at least some of the dramatic price response in 1987 to the fact that futures and options were then traded amongst a small group of professional traders. "Today there is a better balance in the market".
The City's experts think a substantial correction is more likely in the US than the UK. "The US is an accident waiting to happen", said Nick Knight of Nomura. The UK may well follow suit but any correction here is unlikely to be as dramatic.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments