Trade talks need 'better' US offer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Paul Wolfowitz, the head of the World Bank, turned up the pressure on his former employers at the White House yesterday to produce a "better offer to unlock" the stalled trade talks.
In a letter to the leaders of the Group of Eight (G8) nations before their summit this weekend, Mr Wolfowitz warned time was "running out". He said the three main players - the United States, European Union and G20 group of emerging economies - needed to give ground but he hinted the US should move first.
"The G20 wants steeper cuts in US farm subsidies before accepting required cuts in industrial goods. Washington can unlock this by stepping forward with a better offer," he said. "If this happens, the EU will ... meet them both with a strengthened offer. There is a three-way bargain here."
The former deputy defence secretarysaid a successful trade deal would lift millions out of poverty and boost incomes in developing countries.
Negotiations on a new trade agreement began in 2001, aimed at boosting development in the world's poorest countries. But they ran into the ground over demands by poor countries that their rich neighbours cut their subsidies and tariffs protecting their farmers.
An initial deadline of December 2004 was missed after a summit of all 148 nations ended in disarray. The latest deadline of December 2006 looks under threat unless an outline agreement can be reached this month.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments