Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Steve Jobs testimony helps Apple win lawsuit

 

Andrew Dewson
Tuesday 16 December 2014 17:42 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jurors took just three hours today to decide on 10 years’ worth of litigation between Apple and a class action lawsuit that accused the tech giant of using an iPod software upgrade to corner the digital music market.

The eight-man jury in a Federal court in Oakland decided unanimously in Apple’s favour after evidence was presented, including video testimonial from the late Steve Jobs.

Plaintiffs were seeking damages of $350m from Apple to compensate consumers for a subsequent price increases that it claimed were a direct result of Apple’s improved market share.

Under US antitrust law the amount would have been automatically trebled had Apple been found guilty.

The trial ended somewhat farcically, with Apple lawyers accusing the plaintiffs of failing to present a single iPod customer who had actually been damaged by the rise in prices.

Two plaintiffs were withdrawn after it was disclosed that they had not in fact purchased iPods, a third was not given time to testify and an economist appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs admitted that he has not assessed the impact of the new iPod software.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in