Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pru may move to Hong Kong to escape capital rules

Lucy Tobin
Sunday 26 February 2012 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Prudential, Britain's biggest insurer, is considering plans to move its headquarters from London to Hong Kong to escape tough new capital rules from European regulators.

Tidjane Thiam, chief executive, is said to have asked executives to review the options for a move due to fears that planned European regulations demanding insurers increase their capital requirements could force the Pru to hold billions of extra pounds in reserve.

Solvency II rules, due to come in next year, are set to force European insurers to hold extra cash against divisions operating in countries with less exacting capital standards. That could significantly increase the reserves the Pru would be forced to hold against its US business, Jackson Life. But if the insurer which was founded in London 163 years ago instead moved its headquarters to Hong Kong, only the British part of its business would be subject to Solvency II rules.

EU regulators have not yet decided whether American capital rules for insurers are compatible, but Mr Thiam has already voiced heavy criticism of the plans. Pru declined to comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in