Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oxford BioMedica chief seeks to calm fears over patents

Chris Hughes
Thursday 16 March 2000 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Oxford Biomedica, the gene therapy group, yesterday broke the UK biotechnology sector's silence on Bill Clinton and Tony Blair's intervention in the gene patenting debate, which has sent shares in the sector tumbling in the last two days.

The company issued a statement seeking to reassure shareholders that comments on Tuesday by Mssrs Clinton and Blair that gene discoveries should not be patented were no threat to its future.

The statement said: "In general, discoveries cannot, and we believe should not, be patented. However, if one takes a discovery and uses it to make a product, the product is a patentable invention. This was clearly endorsed by President Clinton and Tony Blair."

In spite of the statement, Oxford BioMedica's shares closed down 7p at 84.5p.

The company is a pioneer in the field of gene therapy. It uses discoveries in genomics - the mapping of the human genome - to develop proteins which are injected into the body to stimulate genes to perform particular functions. These include genes that kill tumours and stop the replication of HIV, the virus that causes Aids.

Professor Alan Kingsman, Oxford BioMedica's chief executive, said: "I'm not sure Clinton and Blair said anything too bad. It's the way it's been interpreted that's the problem. They recognise the importance of intellectual property rights as a spur to developing new medicines. No new medicine would be developed without a patent to protect it."

He said he issued the statement in response to anxious calls from confused shareholders. "We're a gene-based company - if we weren't going to put the record straight, who would?"

Professor Kingsman said the company already had patents on all the genes it needed for product development for the foreseeable future.

He added: "Ninety per cent of the value of the UK biotechnology sector doesn't lie in things that come out of the Human Genome Project."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in