NAPF calls for fresh overhaul of pension laws
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Christine Farnish, the recently appointed chief executive of the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), will today launch a major attack on Government pensions policy.
She will call on the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, to simplify pensions law, improve occupation schemes and sweep away rules preventing people from continuing to work for a company once they start drawing a pension from it.
She said: "It's ridiculous that someone can spend 40 years working for Sainsbury, start drawing a pension and then go to work for Tesco because they cannot work for Sainsbury any more. The current state system for pension provision is too complicated. It leads to confusion among consumers, puts people off saving, and loads significant administrative burdens not just on the state, but also on employers and private pension providers."
In its submission to the House of Commons Working Pensions Select Committee the NAPF says pension saving through the workplace has significant advantages: savers benefit from additional contributions from the employer; the employer handles the administration of the scheme; employees' contributions are deducted from payroll and are therefore relatively painless.
"We will therefore be looking at ways of removing the barriers which currently make it difficult for employers to offer worthwhile schemes," she said. "But employees whose company goes bust can lose out on part or all of their expected pension entitlement, so we will be looking at fair and reasonable consumer protection where an employer faces financial difficulties."
In July, when she was appointed, Ms Farnish said: "Whether people should be compelled to save for their pension is a big political issue, but the Government needs to address whether we are going far enough to give incentives or remove disincentives. I'm not going to retire at 60, or even 65: I want to go on doing something, and it's a big area that needs exploring. The demographics will drive it, because otherwise there simply won't be enough people to do all the things we want done in this country."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments