Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Melrose could face rival bid from Cinven in battle to acquire Novar

Julia Kollewe
Monday 29 November 2004 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The cash shell Melrose, which has tabled a £750m hostile takeover bid for Novar, could face a counter-bid from the private-equity firm Cinven, sources said.

The cash shell Melrose, which has tabled a £750m hostile takeover bid for Novar, could face a counter-bid from the private-equity firm Cinven, sources said.

Cinven is thought to be among six potential bidders for the manufacturing company, along with two other private equity firms and three industrial companies including General Electric and Siemens. They are thought to be interested in acquiring either parts of Novar or the entire company. Cinven's expression of interest is understood to be at a very early stage.

Novar rejected the original 145p-a-share cash and shares offer from Melrose, which valued the company at £625m, sparking what promises to be a lengthy and bitter bid battle.

Yesterday, Melrose posted its offer document to shareholders, saying its bid was now worth 172.5p-a-share at the current price of its shares, lifting the value of the offer to about £750m. However, Novar rejected the bid again, saying: "There is nothing new in the Melrose offer document. The Melrose proposal undervalues the group.... We continue to pursue a wide range of opportunities capable of delivering greater value to our shareholders than Melrose's offer." As part of its defence strategy, Novar is considering breaking up the company.

Melrose attacked Novar for its "poor historic financial and management performance," accusing its board of destroying shareholder value. In particular, Melrose attacked the recent appointment of Novar's chief executive, Stephen Howard, who had been a non-executive director for the past four years.

"For most of this time, Mr Howard was chief executive of Cookson Group where he presided over an even greater destruction of shareholder value than that seen at Novar," the Melrose directors said. Chris Miller, the chairman of Melrose, criticised Mr Howard's "sudden" appointment without proper consultation with shareholders, saying: "His record at Cookson speaks for itself. It doesn't look like he's the guy who's going to turn the business around."

In the offer document to shareholders, Mr Miller and David Roper, the chief executive of Melrose, contrasted their performance with that of the Novar management. They warned: "We do not believe that a hasty sale of underperforming businesses will match the value that could be created over time through our approach.... During our time at Wassall, we created nearly £500m of value for shareholders."

But a source close to Novar denied that any disposals would be fire sales, saying that such plans would not be motivated by a desire to frustrate the Melrose offer, but rather to do what is best for shareholders.

Melrose shares rose 2.5p to 130p yesterday. Novar shares fell 0.5p to 160p, giving the company a market value of £689m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in