Jobs on the line at Beeson Gregory as technology start-up losses mount
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Beeson Gregory, the self-styled New Economy investment bank, warned it could axe jobs later this year after interim results showed its bonus pool shrank from £9.5m to zero in the first half.
The bank raised £30m when it floated on the stock market in April 2000 and invested £18.9m in technology start-ups. The portfolio is now valued at £10m.
Beeson made provisions of £8.8m against losses on its investments, sending it to a half-year pre-tax loss of £5.59m. In the same period last year, pre-tax profits were £11.4m and provisions were just £500,000.
Charles Byford, the finance director, said the provisions reflected the risk that many of the start-ups would struggle to raise fresh funds for working capital. "But only two or three are having real problems," he said.
Outside its own investment activities, Beeson has been hit by the downturn in the new issues market, contributing to a fall in turnover from £26.4m to £8.36m. Last year, the bank made huge fees from bringing a raft of technology, software and biotechnology companies to market.
At the operating level, it posted a £3.2m profit and expected to continue trading "marginally profitably" throughout 2001.
The headcount had fallen by only five to 128 since the beginning of the year. But Mr Byford warned: "It's likely that numbers will be lower by the end of the year. Some roles may no longer be necessary."
He added that he did not expect the new issues market to recover until 2002, though there was still an appetite for quality offerings. "We don't see a major change taking place in the autumn. People are more sceptical."
Shares in the company fell 3p to 121.5p. They reached a peak of 357.5p in December after floating at 300p a share.
Quoted rivals such as Teather & Greenwood and Seymour Pierce have also suffered sharp declines in their shares over the same period.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments