GlaxoSmithKline boss quits before full-blown investor revolt over performance
Sir Andrew Witty departure pacifies shareholders but now they fear a cut in dividends
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GlaxoSmithKline’s long-serving boss Sir Andrew Witty has announced he is quitting the company, in a move that observers said was vital to stem a full-blown shareholder revolt.
The City grandee will retire in March next year amid criticism of GSK’s performance from high-profile investors who believe the group would be more successful if it were split up. One shareholder said it seemed likely that chairman Sir Philip Hampton, who joined last year, would have suggested Sir Andrew named a date to leave before tensions with shareholders rose even higher.
The UK’s biggest pharmaceutical company has appointed headhunters Egon Zehnder and Korn Ferry to begin the search for a successor to Sir Andrew, who has been chief executive since 2008 and earned more than £40m in that time.
There has been speculation over his position for the past three years as a downturn in sales and profits, concern over the drug pipeline and a corruption scandal in China have hit GSK.
When Sir Philip, a former chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, took over the chairmanship of GSK last year, it was expected that replacing the company’s leadership would be one of his priorities. The veteran fund manager Neil Woodford has criticised Sir Andrew for not spinning off parts of the group, and called for an external replacement.
A year ago, GSK considered selling off its HIV business, but the strategy was ultimately rejected. Mr Woodford argues that the sum of its parts is greater than its whole. “In essence, Witty is running four FTSE 100 companies, and he’s not doing a very good job in my view,” he said in November.
Och-Ziff Capital Management, the New York hedge fund, has built a 0.5 per cent stake in GSK and has been pressing for change at the top, also preferring an outside candidate.
Sir Andrew was knighted for services to the economy in 2012 and is a government adviser. Last month he was defiant in presenting the company’s strategy, saying that sales of its new products had reached £2bn last year. He also argued that the “annuity”-style income from the vaccine and consumer healthcare businesses helped to make up for the volatile product cycle of developing new drugs.
Internal candidates for his role include GSK’s pharmaceuticals head Abbas Hussain and Emma Walmsley, chief of the consumer healthcare division. David Epstein, head of the pharmaceuticals division at Swiss rival Novartis , is seen as a possible external candidate.
One top shareholder said: “This brings us yet more uncertainty. Will the new person cut the dividend and change the strategy again? Earnings may increase and make that unnecessary, but who knows?”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments