Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Deripaska in talks over cutting his stake in Russian insurance firm

Margareta Pagano
Saturday 02 May 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PPF, the Czech finance group and Generali, Italy's insurance giant are said to be near to agreeing a price to buy more of the Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska's stake in Ingosstrakh, the Russian insurer.

Mr Deripaska, who has majority control with a 60 per cent stake in Ingosstrakh, is understood now to be willing to cut his stake to give PPF and Generali majority control. Sources say PPF and Generali, which own a 38.5 per cent stake between them, may be willing to pay around €500m (£400m) for majority control. Until now, PPF has said it would look at either increasing or reducing its stake. But the Czech group now wants to increase it and talks are now taking place on a fair valuation and how much it should be buying.

Previously, Ingosstrakh's chief executive, Alexander Grigoryev, had indicated that the company is worth between $4bn (£2.7bn) and $5bn, but PPF argued that this was too high and that it was not prepared to pay over the odds for control.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in