Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BCCI creditors seek inquiry into liquidator's costly court action

Julia Kollewe,Banking Correspondent
Thursday 03 November 2005 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The former employees of the collapsed bank BCCI are calling for a government investigation into the conduct of the liquidator Deloitte, after it dropped its £850m damages case against the Bank of England on Wednesday.

The BCCI Campaign Committee, which represents the bank's former staff, said yesterday it had always believed legal action should never have been brought against the Bank. That view was shared by many individual creditors, it claimed.

"There was no case for misfeasance against the Bank of England and legal costs should not be incurred in chasing such an impossible claim. This was a tall order to prove against one of the most revered institutions of England," the committee said.

The Bank has statutory immunity from negligence claims and so the liquidators pursued the stronger claim of misfeasance, which implies that Bank officials were not just reckless but acted dishonestly in failing to prevent the collapse of BCCI in 1991.

The case, which took 11 years to come to court, has cost the creditors about £56m in legal costs plus the liquidator's costs, also estimated at £56m, the committee said. On top of that, the Bank has incurred £70m in legal fees which it is seeking to recover from the liquidator.

Mohammad Qayyum, the joint co-ordinator of the committee, said he would write to the Department of Trade and Industry to demand an investigation into the liquidator's actions. He said the DTI had not been "very responsive" so far. The committee has co-opted Keith Vaz MP, who has campaigned on behalf of BCCI depositors and employees, arguing that the action brought against the Bank was "a waste of money," costing cash which should have gone to the creditors.

The committee said: "It is time the liquidators should stop incurring further and unnecessary costs and wind up the liquidation, paying over all the remaining monies to the creditors." So far, the liquidator has returned 75 per cent of the £4.1bn which is due to creditors and pledged another 6 per cent by December.

At its peak, BCCI had more than 400 branches in about 70 countries and 14,000 staff. The former employees, who believe BCCI should not have been shut down in 1991, have already settled with the liquidator over misappropriation of money and stigma damages, getting £42m in cash and a waiver of loans to the tune of £56m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in