Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Accounting reforms threaten to wipe millions off retail company profits

Heather Tomlinson
Saturday 30 November 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Leading retailers like Marks & Spencer and J Sainsbury could have to make hefty revisions to their accounts under new rules being discussed by standards setters.

The changes could affect any company that has entered into "sale and leaseback" property deals, such as the Big Food Group, SFI and Marconi.

Under the present rules, the transactions flatter accounts. When property is sold, it boosts profit and cashflow. Last year M&S recorded a £51m profit, while Sainsbury's has booked a total £133m profit over the past three years. But the practice could soon be banned.

The transactions involve the company entering long-term leases on the same property it sold, although these are not included in liabilities on the balance sheet.

The UK's Accounting Standards Board has been probing accounting for leases on behalf of the International Accounting Standards Board. The IASB still has to discuss the changes before a formal proposal is made, and it could be several years before they come into effect. But if they are imposed in their strictest form, companies would have to restate the transaction as a loan rather than an operating lease, wipe out any profits booked and substantially increase debt.

"The ASB and the IASB recognises a new approach is needed that must address the issue of sale and leaseback," said Andrew Lennard, ASB's director of operations. "To the extent that they have elements of financing transactions, we must ensure they are treated as loans."

He could not comment on individual companies.

Any group with large leases would be affected, such as airlines that rent their aircraft. Sir David Tweedie, head of the IASB, said: "I doubt you've ever flown in an aircraft that's on the balance sheet."

M&S said it was keen to be transparent. Sainsbury's declined to comment.

Companies doing sale and leaseback often argue that property is sitting on the balance sheet at undervalued levels, so the deals crystallise shareholder value.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in