NAPF chief proposes end to tax-free nest eggs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Anne Robinson, director general of the National Association of Pension Funds, yesterday courted controversy by suggesting that the Government scraps the 25 per cent tax-free lump sum paid to millions of people on retirement, in exchange for restoring tax breaks previously enjoyed by the pension fund industry, writes Nic Cicutti.
She told a packed meeting of delegates in Glasgow yesterday that a deal might be struck with the Government. She said that if fund managers were allowed to claim back the 25 per cent of advanced corporation tax (ACT), against the 20 per cent they claim at present, then the NAPF might give up its support for the tax-free lump sum paid when people take out their pensions.
Restoring ACT back to 25 per cent would enable pension fund managers to boost the value of dividends they receive on their investments by 6.25 per cent. But millions of members of schemes that link pensions paid out to years of service would be badly hit by the move.
The level of ACT that can be reclaimed from the Inland Revenue was reduced by Norman Lamont, then the Chancellor, in 1993. The move, announced in that year's budget, led to billions of pounds being wiped off the value of shares overnight.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments