Names told to expect prompt payment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Litigating Lloyd's of London names were yesterday told they could expect prompt payment of part of the estimated £504m damages they are to receive after a High Court judge ruled in October that they had been the victims of negligence by their age nts.
Doubt had been cast over the payments by the agents' insurers and other litigating Lloyd's names, whose cases are expected to come to court over the next few years.
In a hearing last year, the agents insurers had argued they should not be forced to meet any interim payment the judge decided to award. Yesterday, however, the judge said the insurers would have to meet any interim payment.
Also, the judge decided not to support demands, from other litigating names, that Gooda Walker names should not receive payment until all the legal actions between names and their agents had been resolved.
The other names had claimed that if the Gooda Walker names were paid now, on a first come first served basis, the pot of insurance cover available to meet subsequent court awards would be exhausted.
Michael Deeny, Chairman of the Gooda Walker Action Group, said: "It was suggested that first come first served was unfair. The alternative would have been for our names to wait until perhaps the next century before receiving any damages."
The names will hear how much they are to be awarded as an interim payment in early February.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments