Name change scoots Freepages into court battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHEN Freepages, the telephone directory service, decided to change its brand name to Scoot, it didn't think anybody would be upset. But it reckoned without a firm of south coast residential letting agents.
To Freepages, Scoot was a meaningless and inoffensive term that could be adopted in any country where people wanted to find out where the nearest plumber, bookshop or taxi service was.
But to Michael Deacon of Allan & Bath in Bournemouth, Scoot meant something else altogether - an animal and bird repellent used to prevent cats, dogs, rabbits, hares, squirrels and even from fouling the garden.
Earlier this week an Oxfordshire County Court judge agreed with Mr Deacon and ordered Scoot to repay Allan & Bath a year's subscription fees and its out of pocket expenses, a sum totalling pounds 2,750.
The clincher apparently came when Mr Deacon's side produced a box of the animal repellent in court whereupon it was instantly recognised by the district judge. "The lawyer for Freepages took one look at it and his jaw sort of dropped," said Mr Deacon. "It was as if he was thinking to himself 'Beam me up Scottie' .''
In its defence Freepages, which is now valued at pounds 145m, maintained: "There is no difference between Freepages and Scoot apart from the name."
The judge took a different view ruling that the change of trading name "represented a fundamental breach of contract".
Freepages shrugged off its court defeat, saying it had 35,000 subscribers in the UK and had only received two complaints, including the one from Allan & Bath.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments