Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MPs call for pounds 1bn aerospace funding: Irreversible damage unless more cash is provided, Government warned

Michael Harrison,Industrial Editor
Wednesday 21 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A CROSS-PARTY committee of MPs yesterday challenged the Government to demonstrate its new-found commitment to manufacturing industry by pumping an extra pounds 1bn into the aerospace sector over the next decade.

The Commons trade and industry select committee warned that unless there was more funding for research and a national strategic plan for the key civil and military technologies needed for the next century the sector could suffer 'irreversible damage'.

In a highly critical report the MPs also called on ministers to ease the rules governing launch aid schemes and spell out its policy towards the aerospace sector much more clearly.

Launching the report, Richard Caborn, the committee chairman, said the aerospace industry was 'not a lame duck asking for rescue but an area of technological strength seeking the chance to compete on something like equal terms'.

Heading the MPs' 19 recommendations is a call for the Department of Trade and Industry to implement the national strategic technology acquisition plan drawn up by its own advisory committee. According to industry estimates, this would require extra DTI funding of pounds 90m-pounds 100m a year for the next 10 years compared with a figure of less than pounds 20m earmarked for each of the next three years.

If ministers agreed, industry would match government funding allowing research into key technologies such as advanced wing design, cockpit systems and new composite engine materials.

'This is not a good time to be calling for increased government spending but the sums involved . . . are not massive in public expenditure terms and are small in relation to the industry's turnover and contribution to the balance of payments,' says the report.

'Moreover, the extra expenditure falls squarely within one of the Government's priority areas - the revival of manufacturing industry.'

The Society of British Aerospace Companies said it welcomed the announcement by the industry minister, Tim Sainsbury, that he would adopt the priorities set out in the advisory committee's technology plan as DTI policy. But his statement made no mention of whether the Government would increase funding.

Although the aerospace industry has been one of Britain's most successful, contributing pounds 2.5bn to the balance of payments last year, the MPs said the Government lacked a coherent approach to it.

At the same time the launch aid scheme, under which pounds 1.22bn has been paid in refundable loans to seven aircraft and aero-engine projects since 1979, has now become a net earner of income for the Government with receipts exceeding expenditure by pounds 26.7m last financial year.

The MPs say the Government should consider deferring repayments to ease company cash flow problems, providing guarantees rather than cash and adopting a more positive attitude towards launch aid applications from equipment suppliers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in