Moody’s pays out $864m over risky mortgage ratings in run up to 2008 financial crisis
Settlement also contains 'factual admission' of the firm’s conduct
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Credit rating agency Moody’s has said it will pay out almost $864m to US states and federal authorities to settle allegations the firm’s credit ratings for residential mortgages contributed to the worst financial crisis since the 1930s.
The US Department of Justice said the settlement also contained a “factual admission” of the firm’s conduct.
The terms of the deal will see Moody’s pay a $437.5m fine to the Department of Justice, and the remaining $426.3m split between 21 US states and Washington DC.
In a statement, the Department of Justice said: “Moody’s failed to adhere to its own credit rating standards and fell short on its pledge of transparency in the run-up to the Great Recession.”
“Today’s settlement contains not only a significant penalty and factual admissions of its conduct, but also a commitment by Moody’s to new and continued compliance measures designed to ensure the integrity of credit ratings going forward.”
The statement added: “Investors relied on Moody’s credit ratings to be objective and independent, and they naturally expected Moody’s to follow its own published methods.”
“Our investigation revealed, and Moody’s has now acknowledged, that Moody’s used a more lenient standard than it had itself published.”
The settlement also included “non-monetary measures”, agreed on with the Department of Justice, designed to ensure the integrity of future credit ratings the firm issues. This includes a commitment to keep financial analysts out of commercial discussions and agreements.
In a statement, Moody’s said: “After careful consideration, Moody’s determined that the agreement, which removes significant legacy legal risk and avoids costs and uncertainty associated with continued investigations and litigations, is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders.
The company added: “Moody’s stands behind the integrity of its ratings, methodologies and processes, and the settlement contains no finding of any violation of law, nor any admission of liability.”
Moody’s is the second largest ratings firm in the world, after Standard and Poor’s, which made a similar settlement in 2015, paying out $1.375bn.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments