Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Moaning becomes Electra: The Investment Column

Edited Tom Stevenson
Wednesday 18 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Electra Investment Trust is puzzled that its shares trade at a 19 per cent discount to net asset value while 3i is at a 5 per cent premium. Both are that rare breed of trust specialising in venture capital investments and put most of their money in unquoted stocks.

There are differences that explain part of the discrepancy. 3i is bigger, and is in the FTSE 100, so it has to be a component of indexed portfolios, unlike Electra, which has not had much of a recent flow of new investors. 3i is also largely a UK business, while much of Electra's investment is in the US.

3i's performance has been less volatile in the past because it has a spread of several thousand investments against a couple of hundred at Electra, which the market therefore regards as making it a worse bet in any future recession. The trust is just that little more dependent than 3i on continued steady growth of the economy.

There are also the first signs of overheating in the venture capital market, with some prices becoming silly, which might affect the larger deals in which Electra specialises rather more than 3i.

Yet this cannot explain the whole of the difference in the discount at which the two shares are trading, especially after yesterday's full-year results for Electra, which show an 18.5 per cent increase in net asset value to 522p a share, half as much again as the increase in the all-share index. Michael Stodddart, Electra's chairman, can boast of being well ahead of the index over both three and five years.

In the latest year, the dividend rose 11.3 per cent, partly because of a new accounting standard that forces investment trusts to split management expenses and interest equally between capital and revenue accounts. The double-digit increase is a one-off, but Mr Stoddart promises a more progressive dividend policy. He is campaigning for a rerating of the shares, has arranged for private investors to buy them through Fleming Investment Trusts Share Plan (Fleming is half-owner of Electra's management company) and he is promoting the stock to new institutions. The shares rose 5p to 425.5p. On these figures, he is right that the discount to net asset value is still unjustifiably large. Good value.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in