Mixed fortunes shared by insurance brokers: Steel Burrill Jones reports loss after restructuring as Nelson Hurst's strategy results in pounds 5.3m profit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TWO small insurance brokers yesterday reported opposing results. Steel Burrill Jones reported a pre-tax loss of pounds 521,000, for the year ended last December, compared with a profit of pounds 13.27m, while Nelson Hurst reported an increase in profits over the same period from pounds 1.4m to pounds 5.3m.
Steel Burrill Jones's poor performance was the result of a range of additional costs in the form of reorganisation, bad debts and litigation.
The company said the total of pounds 4.39m paid for reorganisation over the half year was mainly due to redundancy, property and systems outlay and also included the costs associated with the sale of the business of SBJ Harrison Stuart. At the year end, the group said, approximately half of this charge had 'crystallised'.
Steel Burril Jones added: 'In the interim results, the group made a charge of pounds 3.05m to cover the possible consequences of failed or failing insurers and complex litigation in the international insurance market and other exception costs. At the year end little of this charge had crystallised, but the board considers it prudent to hold the provision until the various circumstances covered by it become clearer, which is not expected to occur before the second half of 1994.'
Commenting on future prospects, the group said: 'Overall, although 1994 may see a slight decline in brokerage, the most important change will be the level of expenses where the cost and efficiency review has achieved substantial savings for 1994 and onwards.'
Nelson Hurst said its stock market flotation last year gave it 'a sound base from which to continue its development'.
'Based on a proven strategy of maximising existing strengths and building new business relationships to establish and sustain meaningful competitive advantage in our chosen business areas, we look forward to 1994 as a year of continued growth,' it said.
The group pointed out that since it was diversified into a range of businesses one poor sector was often counter-balanced by more favourable conditions in another.
David Woodward, group chairman, said last year's results were affected by lower interest rates reducing investment income and the generally weak economic conditions.
Steel Burrill Jones is recommending a final dividend of 6p, making 9p a share for the year, compared with 13.25p a year ealier. Nelson Hurst is recommending no dividend for the 1993 results although an interim dividend will be payable for the year ending December 1994.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments