Mid Kent considers bid for Folkestone
Utilities: United criticises Offer for underestimating scale of electricity roll-out as two water companies announce rise in profits
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mid Kent Water yesterday unexpectedly signalled its interest in buying neighbouring Folkestone and Dover Water Services, owned by one of the two French utility giants which were blocked from buying the Maidstone- based group earlier this year after a lengthy Monopolies & Mergers Commission investigation, writes Chris Godsmark.
Geoff Baldwin, chief executive of the Mid Kent Holdings parent company, said he had raised the possibility of a bid for Folkestone and Dover with General Utilities, part of Generale des Eaux, the utility conglomerate which owns 24 per cent of Mid Kent's shares. Saur, the other French group which owns South East Water, sold its 20 per cent stake in Mid Kent after the proposed joint bid was blocked by Ian Lang, former President of the Board of Trade.
"It's something we've talked about with General Utilities. But we are not going aggressively into battle," said Mr Baldwin. He said it would be a good way for General Utilities to realise the value of its investment in Mid Kent, should it decide to sell its shares.
Mid Kent defended the pounds 2.4m cost of the MMC process, much of which had gone to pay its lawyers, Norton Rose. But Mr Baldwin was concerned that the DTI had still not imposed formal undertakings on the two groups to prevent further bid approaches.
"We were in the pending tray when John Major called the election. The undertakings need reconfirming. I want assurances from the DTI that they will be in place," he said.
The comments came as Mid Kent announced a 12 per cent rise in annual profits to pounds 13.8m and signalled its intention to seek shareholders' approval to buy back 10 per cent of its shares.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments