Lord Hanson is forced to apologise
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LORD HANSON was yesterday forced into an embarrassing public apology over a controversial proposal made by the company to curb shareholders' rights to question the board, writes Neil Thapar.
Lord Hanson, chairman of the industrial conglomerate bearing his name, told a shareholders' meeting in London that the plan had been 'wrong and overdone'.
Addressing the 100-strong meeting, he said: 'I have made a mistake on this and apologise for creating the thought in your minds that we intended to treat you unfairly.'
The proposal, withdrawn yesterday, would have given the chairman powers to block shareholders from speaking more than once on any matter; prevent them from speaking if it was 'prejudicing an orderly conduct' of a meeting; and reject demands for a poll by investors.
However, the plans ran into a storm of protest from institutional and private shareholders, forcing the company to back off. Under close questioning from a shareholder Lord Hanson revealed that the group's six non-executive directors had not examined the 'fine print' of the proposal before approving it.
'Not all the non-executive directors were able to go through the fine print but I am responsible,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments