Lloyds to buy farm mortgage specialist
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LLOYDS BANK is to buy the Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, the specialist lender in which the Bank of England has a 27.4 per cent stake. The price for the 86.7 per cent Lloyds does not already own is pounds 27m, writes Peter Rodgers.
The AMC was set up by statute in 1928, and has been jointly owned since then by the main clearing banks, including Lloyds, and the Bank of England.
With farmers expressing concern that interest rates will rise when the AMC comes under single ownership, Lloyds said it was a condition of the sale that the organisation would be run as an independent company under its existing name.
The AMC provides competitively priced loans for 12,000 farmers, foresters and horticulturalists. But with just under pounds 1bn out on loan, it has only 9 per cent of the UK agricultural finance market of pounds 12.6bn. The acquisition will more than double Lloyds' existing share of 7 per cent.
Profits in the year to last March were pounds 7.8m. The price Lloyds is paying values the AMC at 60 per cent of net asset value last March of pounds 52m. Finance businesses normally change hands for at least net asset value.
But one shareholder said the AMC was not as cheap as it looked because of uncertainty over the future of the agricultural sector and an erratic profits record over the years. 'It has never been a very good investment for us,' the shareholder said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments