Lloyd's names in legal setback
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than 600 investors with Lloyd's of London yesterday failed in their legal bid to prevent the insurance market from pursing them for pounds 130m of debts.
The investors - known as names - had challenged an attempt by Lloyd's to recover money for its rescue vehicle, Equitas, in the High Court. Equitas was formed in 1996 to reinsure more than pounds 10bn of losses made between 1988 and 1992.
The Names claimed Lloyd's had used inaccurate records in an effort to assess their debts, including amounts not owed to Equitas.
Lloyd's admitted it had made mistakes in assessing the amounts owed to Equitas, including other debts which were owed to Lloyd's itself. But the judge, Mr Justice Tuckey, said the records were now in order.
The judgement opens the way for Lloyd's to extract payment from those Names who have not contributed to the 1996 agreement, which settled Lloyd's massive debts.
Ron Sandler, Lloyd's new chief executive, said: "This is an important decision in assisting Lloyd's debt recovery from Names who did not accept the reconstruction and renewal programme. It will be welcomed by all those members - over 94 per cent - who accepted the settlement offer and met their liabilities."
When the settlement was first announced in 1996, nearly 2,000 names resisted, effectively leaving other Lloyd's names to pay the bill on their behalf. However, Lloyd's yesterday said it had reduced this number to 800, including the 600 who went to court.
A spokesman for Lloyd's said the minority who had resisted the settlement were now looking at larger debts. This was because they had forfeited the right to debt credits offered to names who agreed to take part.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments