Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lilley inaction 'failed Maxwell pensioners'

Jason Nisse
Saturday 29 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PETER LILLEY, the Secretary of State for Social Security, is coming under fire for failing to act on a report, handed to him when he was Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, which could have helped prevent Maxwell pensioners being robbed of more than pounds 400m.

Frank Field, chairman of the House of Commons Social Security Select Committee, plans to write to Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, in the next few days to ask why the DTI took more than a year to pass on the recommendations from its own inspectors who investigated the mini-conglomerate Bestwood, where money was stolen from pension funds in a Maxwell- style scandal.

The report was passed to the DTI in March 1991, more than seven months before Robert Maxwell died and four months before the bulk of the pounds 400m was taken out of the pension funds and used to secure loans to private companies in the Maxwell empire.

Mr Lilley was Trade Secretary during the period in which the DTI sat on the report, and will have to justify his actions before the social security committee on Wednesday.

The report into Bestwood, and its subsidiary Atlanta Fund Managers, was written by Gabriel Moss, one of the leading commercial QCs, and John Venning, partner at the accountants Robson Rhodes, and handed to the DTI on 26 March, 1991.

It was not published immediately as the Serious Fraud Office was investigating the company and ultimately obtained convictions against three people involved in the scandal, in which more than pounds 1m was taken from the pension funds of firms owned by Bestwood.

A number of points not relevant to the SFO inquiry could have been released, however. Mr Moss and Mr Venning specifically recommended that the social security secretary restrict the level of 'employer-related investment' by pension funds to 5 per cent of the fund's assets, that there should be at least one independent trustee on the board of pension funds and that the law be changed so that the funds are managed by someone wholly independent of the employers or trustees.

The first and third recommendations would have significantly changed the way the Maxwell pension schemes were operated. As one former Maxwell executive said, after reading the Bestwood report: 'It might not have stopped the theft, but it would have been another red light flashing down Throgmorton Street.'

However, the DTI did not pass the recommendations in the report to the Department of Social Security until April 1992, by which time Mr Lilley had left and Mr Heseltine taken over.

Two months later Mr Lilley, in his new role, announced that there would be a fundamental review of pension regulation. He set up a committee, under the Oxford don Roy Goode, to review pensions regulation. The Goode committee, however, has come up with recommendations less stringent than those by Mr Moss and Mr Venning.

'It is quite clear that the Maxwell pension funds were substantially raided after our report was written,' said Mr Moss.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in