Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Light at end of tunnel for P&O

The Investment Column

Edited Tom Stevenson
Monday 15 July 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The 9p rise in P&O's share price yesterday to 492p represented a welcome respite after almost three years of dramatic underperformance by the container shipping to ferries, cruises and property conglomerate.

The bounce will, however, have capped a bad 48 hours for Lord Sterling, the group's chairman. He won't have relished the implied confirmation of a Sunday newspaper survey of fund managers suggesting that most of the large institutions were after his head.

The poor performance of P&O in recent years partly reflected the market's disenchantment with conglomerates generally. But there are a number of company-specific problems that P&O is struggling to overcome.

Put together in a haphazard way over many years, P&O is a ragbag of unrelated interests, a fact tacitly acknowledged in March when Lord Sterling pre- empted calls for a break-up by promising a pounds 1bn disposal and flotation programme to create a more focused group with fewer, larger divisions.

The programme, which included the flotation of Bovis Homes, and the sale of pounds 500m of investment properties would, Lord Sterling hoped, return the group to operating margins of 15 per cent, a level P&O had not achieved in more than a decade.

It would also generate the cash to continue paying a 30.5p dividend, the level of the payout for years now and patently unsustainably high in the absence of the cash provided by property sales in the boom years of the 1970s and 1980s. Inflation has always bailed P&O out; now the company was showing signs of learning to live in a less favourable environment.

That was the theory. Since then the shares have continued to underperform as the market focused on the fact that, while P&O's businesses are not intrinsically badly run, they are operating in difficult markets. Commercial property is in the doldrums, container shipping is fiercely competitive and generates a return on assets little better than a building society account, and the cross-Channel ferry market has been clobbered by the Channel Tunnel.

As a result, analysts have steadily edged forecasts back and last year's fall in profits from pounds 350m to pounds 320m, itself a collapse from 1993's pounds 521m, is unlikely to be rectified this year. Profits of perhaps pounds 315m are the consensus now.

There is some light at the end of the tunnel, however, and if, as expected, the Government clears the way this week for some sort of co-operation between P&O and Stena on the hard-hit cross-Channel routes then prospects could brighten considerably for one of the group's largest and most troubled divisions. The other good news is thatP&O's dividend looks reasonably safe. At almost 8 per cent, the gross income on that payout looks increasingly attractive at more than twice the rate of inflation and, if nothing else, it puts a solid floor under the share price. Lord Sterling may still have an uphill struggle to rebuild bridges with the City, but the shares look good value.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in