Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Liffe considers trading in mutual status as it moves out of the pits

Peter Thal Larsen
Sunday 05 April 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE LONDON International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (Liffe) will next month propose changes in its ownership structure which could see it turned into a private company and possibly opt for a stock market flotation.

The exchange is understood to have appointed Schroders, the merchant bank, to look at the possibilities for changing its structure. The proposed changes are a result of Liffe's plans to replace the "open outcry" trading system - where traders signal to each other in pits - with an electronic screen-based trading system. That would open up the exchange to a huge number of users around Europe. However, it would also undermine the current mutual structure, which restricts trading rights to members of Liffe.

As a result, the exchange is looking at ways of turning itself into a normal company, with its existing members as shareholders.

A Liffe spokesman confirmed that the changes were under consideration. "We don't want to limit access to Liffe," he said. "So we have to break the link between shareholders and traders."

Liffe's 215 member firms will be asked to vote on the move to electronic trading at an extraordinary meeting next month. They will also be asked to consider the options for the exchange's ownership structure.

The changes at Liffe are a response to increased competition from other exchanges, principally the Deutsche Terminborse in Frankfurt. The German exchange, which operates a screen-based trading system, recently overtook Liffe as the leading exchange in trading German bond futures, known as Bunds.

Liffe is planning to spend over pounds 20m developing a screen-based system to trade Bunds but this will not be ready for 18 months. A cheeky offer from the Germans to share their system was turned down.

Last month, Liffe slashed transaction fees on financial futures and options products in an attempt to stimulate trading volumes and lure back some business.

Nevertheless, the exchange has come in for vociferous criticism from its members. David Kyte, a leading trader who last month resigned from Liffe's board, has accused the management of not responding quickly enough to changing conditions. The exchange has gone some way to counter that criticism by reducing its board from 24 members to 18 and engaging headhunters to find a full-time chairman. The current incumbent, Jack Wigglesworth, will step down in June after serving his three-year term.

Liffe currently charges its members for "seats" on the exchange. However, the majority of its revenues, which were just over pounds 100m last year, are made by taking a minuscule cut of every transaction that takes place on the exchange. Trading volumes are running at about pounds 250bn a year. Liffe also has a cash pile of about pounds 150m, though part of this is the reserve the exchange has to keep to meet regulatory requirements.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in