Letter: Ignore downers, PEPs do you good
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AT THE start of Nick Gilbert's article on personal equity plans (7 November) he suggested PEPs should be labelled 'unsuitable for basic-rate taxpayers', on the basis that charges exceeded the tax reclaimed. I suggest that this is not the right way to approach PEP investments. The key question is whether or not the tax benefits derived from holding an investment in PEP form exceed any additional costs involved.
As far as unit trust PEPs are concerned, most companies, like ourselves, make no charge for PEPing a unit trust. Consequently, investors who consider it appropriate to invest in a unit trust, should hold it in PEP form because the additional tax benefits are achieved at no extra cost. This is illustrated by someone who invested in our Equity High Income Trust in 1989 and has seen total growth of 62.7 per cent, compared with 53.2 per cent in the same unit trust outside a PEP.
Hence, the effect of reinvesting the tax reclaimed under the PEP has boosted growth by 9.5 per cent over four and a half years.
Although tax credits on dividends have been reduced, increasing income by reclaiming tax at 20 per cent will still have a worthwhile effect on the return.
The message is that unit trust PEPs generate substantial extra benefits at no extra cost to the investor.
Andy Harrison
Chief Executive, Clerical Medical Unit Trust Managers Ltd
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments