Land agency claims `untrue'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ENGLISH Partnerships (EP), the Government's pounds 200m-a-year regeneration agency, is being investigated by the National Audit Office following allegations that the agency lacks leadership and has exaggerated the success of its work.
An NAO spokesman said the public- spending watchdog had been taking soundings from industry sources as part of a preliminary study. It approached local authorities and interested bodies, including the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and spoke to members involved with regeneration.
The NAO was told that EP's chief executive, Anthony Dunnett, a former banker, lacked the requisite property expertise. A member said: "The job was a bit of a poisoned chalice. It would have been a tough job for any individual."
Trevor Beattie, head of policy at EP, said: "It's not for me to pre-empt the NAO's work but there is a distinction between what it is told and its conclusions." Last year EP claimed to have created and "safeguarded" 24,200 jobs and reclaimed 1,100 hectares of derelict land.
However, there is scepticism over the extent of the regeneration claimed. Nigel Smith, chair of the RICS land use and planning panel, circulated a paper to the RICS regeneration group recently, describing the claims as "out with the fairies".
The paper said: "Where projects are multi-funded by, say, the single regeneration budget, English Partnerships and European and Lottery funding, everyone claims the outputs. It's time we stopped deluding ourselves and started looking at the quality of outputs rather than meaningless numbers."
Others in the regeneration industry share his concern. Andrew Carter, regeneration adviser at Greater London Enterprises, said: "A lot of double counting goes on." However Mr Beattie, on behalf of EP, denied this and said: "We're not double counting. We maximise the output for every penny without exaggerating."
The NAO will decide over the next month whether to go ahead with a full investigation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments