Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ladbroke unfazed by Hilton's ITT bid

Tom Stevenson
Tuesday 28 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ladbroke was unfazed yesterday by Monday night's $10.5bn (pounds 6.5bn) bid from its US partner Hilton Hotels (HHC) for ITT, owner of the Sheraton hotel chain and Caesars World casinos, writes Tom Stevenson. Initial worries yesterday that the deal might get in the way of a potential bid for Ladbroke by Hilton evaporated and the shares closed 0.5p higher yesterday at 229p.

Analysts had earlier speculated that Hilton's planned acquisition of a 20 per cent stake in Ladbroke, a possible precursor to a bid, might be put on the back burner now the US hotel group had bigger fish to fry. A cross-shareholding arrangement was struck earlier this month as part of a larger marketing and reservations co-operation agreement between Hilton and Ladbroke, which has the rights to Hilton hotels outside North America.

The deal re-united the Hilton brand name around the world for the first time in 33 years. It allowed both sides to take a stake of up to 20 per cent in the other and Hilton had indicated that it intended to take an initial investment of 5 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in