Labour joins attack on PIA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour's City spokesman, Alastair Darling, yesterday joined the attack against a financial regulator's move to water down rules for financial advisers involved in the mis-selling of personal pensions, writes Nic Cicutti.
Mr Darling claimed the Personal Investment Authority had backed away from its earlier policy in the face of pressure from specialist insurers who would otherwise have been forced to foot the bill.
"This is a prime example of where self-regulation of financial services does not work," he said. "The regulator is forced to negotiate with a tied interest and is not able to do it properly.
"The insurance industry must realise that public confidence in it will be further undermined by such behaviour." Mr Darling said he would raise the issue last night in the House of Commons debate on the Finance Bill.
His comments follow a decision by the financial regulator to amend the wording of letters to be sent to savers who may have been wrongly advised to set up private pensions.
After a nine-month boycott from up to 2,000 independent financial advisers and the refusal of indemnity insurers to pick up the tab for any redress to transfer victims, the PIA finally agreed to delete any reference to compensation from the letters.
Its cave-in has been condemned by the Consumers Association as potentially stopping tens of thousands of people from claiming a review of their pensions. But the Treasury backed the PIA, claiming the decision would break the log-jam and lead to an early review of the most urgent cases.
One mutually owned indemnity insurer, LIBM, also supported the deal, although it argued that the matter should have been resolved months ago.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments