Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

L&Y seeks to retrieve pounds 10m loss

Saturday 08 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LANCASHIRE & Yorkshire Friendly Society is investigating whether it can retrieve from former directors and advisers some of the pounds 10m it has been forced to levy on policy-holders, writes Caroline Merrell.

The society has hired solicitors Taylor & Emmett to produce a report on the circumstances leading to the imposition of the levy, caused by losses on property investments.

The society was forced to levy 12 per cent on all its 70,000 policies last year to make up for losses on investments made through its Capital Secure Fund and to pay for a possible extra pounds 2m tax liability on lump sum payments made into policies. A subsequent hearing in the High Court found that the imposition of a levy on policies would need a change in the rules of the society.

All the society's members will be given the opportunity to vote on the rule change at an AGM due before May.

Mike Booth, administration manager of the society, said that if the members took a decision to vote against the rule change, the society would become insolvent.

He added that policy-holders would then be able to claim on the friendly societies' own insurance against insolvency. 'Any claim on the insurance only pays out a maximum of 90 per cent,' he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in