Knight Williams hits at SIB delays
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NIC CICUTTI
Knight Williams, the failed investment adviser, has launched a bitter rearguard attack on the City's most senior financial watchdog for alleged failures that led to its collapse.
Delays by the Securities and Investments Board in assessing the compensation amount owed to hundreds of small investors precipitated Knight Williams' decision to go into liquidation, the directors claimed. They also said delays prevented some compensation being paid to clients months earlier.
Their scathing attack is contained in a report given to creditors at a meeting on Monday. Knight Williams said that after meeting potential claims against it of up to pounds 1.3m from at least 100 creditors, it should have more than pounds 1m to meet other, unspecified liabilities. These include the cost of compensating up to 400 former Knight Williams investors who claim they were poorly advised.
But KW said that its own estimate of the compensation to be paid to former investors had been pounds 150,000, while SIB's was enough for "the liabilities of KW to exceed its assets".
Yet SIB's view was given "without offering reasons for an assessment in any single case", the directors said.
A spokeswoman for the SIB yesterday dismissed the attack, saying that the regulator had acted throughout with the best interests of investors in mind.
Former investors face a long and bitter battle to have themselves recognised as creditors of the company, and thus claim some of the assets to be disposed of by the company's liquidators, Arthur Andersen.
Insolvency experts pointed out that this would be difficult, given that investors have to do more than simply establish a contract with Knight Williams.
Tony Stockwell, a partner at Stephenson Harwood, said: "In principle that can happen. But then each individual case must be looked at by a liquidator to assess whether they fulfil the criteria allowing them to claim a share of the assets."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments