Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kleinwort sued over firm's failure

Peter Rodgers
Monday 02 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MERCHANT bankers Kleinwort Benson are being sued by Ernst & Young for several million pounds over the collapse of Sound Diffusion, the electrical company that went under in December 1988, writes Peter Rodgers.

The move follows an out-of-court settlement in which E&Y, Sound Diffusion's auditors, paid compensation to investors who took up shares in a rights issue in May 1988, seven months before the collapse. Ernst is calling on Kleinwort, as Sound Diffusion's merchant bank advisers at the time of the rights issue, to pick up the tab.

In 1992, Ernst settled out of court for pounds 1.4m with Tunstall Group after the company had sued the auditors for losses it incurred as a result of buying Sound Diffusion shares in the rights issue. Ernst later offered to extend the compensation to other shareholders in Sound Diffusion.

The firm denied liability at the time, but said it was concerned over the costs of legal actions and felt a 'moral obligation to extend the Tunstall deal to other shareholders'. Ernst offered 25 per cent of the value of rights exercised in the issue.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in