Judge gives Elstree film studios a temporary reprieve: Brent Walker calls off the bulldozers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ELSTREE film studios won a temporary reprieve yesterday when its owner, Brent Walker, the debt-laden property and leisure group, gave a High Court undertaking not to bring in the bulldozers.
Brent Walker has outline planning permission to develop half the site as a retail superstore. Last year it announced that the studio complex on the other half would close - unless a buyer came forward - because it was under-used.
Hertsmere Borough Council says it was a condition of the planning consent in 1990 that the studios would be maintained for film and TV production until 2015. Brent Walker could forfeit a pounds 10m bond if the site is used for other purposes.
The council's campaign to keep open the studios was backed by leading lights of the film industry including Steven Spielberg, who made and his Indiana Jones trilogy there.
Mr Justice Jacob ordered that the matter go to trial, though this should not happen within three months.
Brent Walker had argued that because it had not yet proceeded with developing the site within the time limit of three years it was free to pull down the old buildings. The judge said Brent Walker's arguments had a compelling but wholly abstract logic.
'To my mind they lead to such an absurd conclusion that they are very probably wrong,' he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments