IoD backs law to charge interest on late payment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE INSTITUTE of Directors has added its voice to those calling for a statutory right to interest on overdue trade debt, writes Paul Durman.
The institute believes that a statutory right to interest would bring about a change in the behaviour of firms, particularly those large enough to use their commercial power to keep suppliers waiting for payment. It wants the new law to be binding on the public sector where payment practices are often poor.
In a submission to the Department of Trade and Industry the institute says existing court procedures make recovery of debt difficult and often impractical.
'If payments are persistently made, for example, 20 days after they become due, this is sufficient to cause real cash flow difficulties for suppliers but not long enough for legal action to be sensible course. Debtors can therefore pay late, habitually, with impunity.'
The institute is dismissive of the Government's attempt to encourage firms to adhere to a code of good practice and strongly opposed to establishing a British Standard on prompt payment which would create unnecessary paperwork.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments