Investors oust entire board of Brazilian trust
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The entire board of Foreign & Colonial's Brazilian Smaller Companies Investment Trust (Brazit) were yesterday removed by majority shareholders as a fierce row over corporate governance came to a head.
Hermes and City of London, two investment managers that have pushed the issue of corporate governance, led shareholders to a 97 per cent vote in favour of removing the directors.
The directors include Michael Hart, who is also director-general of the trade body for investment trusts, the Association of Investment Trust Companies. A Brazilian finance minister, Mailson Da Nobrega, has also been ousted.
Hermes and City of London had criticised Mr Hart's position, as distinct from his conduct, in that he was also a senior figure at Foreign & Colonial, the investment manager which picked investments.
Hermes and other investment managers have been campaigning since last March to force all listed companies to comply with rules of corporate governance as set out in the Hampel report. Hermes said this requires that non-executive directors are not only independent, but are seen to be independent.
A dispute with Mr Hart and other directors over their independence turned nasty before Christmas, after Foreign & Colonial's fund managers decided to buy 19 per cent of warrants in Brazit's trust. It appeared these could be used to block any attempt to remove Foreign & Colonial as fund managers.
Mr Hart yesterday lashed out at Hermes and City of London, branding the vote an example of "macho corporate governance". However, Hermes pointed out that it had gained the support of almost all the minority shareholders in a 70 per cent turnout.
Peter Butler, a Hermes executive, said the fund manager had been struggling since last March to ensure all non-executives were "not only independent, but seen to be independent." All investment trust directors are meant to be independent non-executives.
He said: "We are hoping we won't ever again have to remove the whole board of an investment trust. It is much, much better to do it in other ways. The problem is, people take it personally.
"We are not casting aspersions on the character of an individual. It is just that we are concerned when directors are former executives of the fund managers - or directors of other trusts managed by the same fund manager."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments